慌しい一日の終わりには、La Quinta by Wyndham New York City Central Parkでおくつろぎください。La Quinta by Wyndham New York City Central Parkは、ニューヨークの現地の雰囲気を感じたいお客様にお勧めの施設です。当施設はグランド・セントラル駅から4km、ラガーディア空港から17kmと、立地に優れています。市内の交通網は充実しており、徒歩圏内には72丁目駅があります。付近のエリアは、ニューヨーク近代美術館やトップ オブ ザ ロック、セントラル・パークなど、観光名所が豊富なことで有名です。館内の様々な施設で、有意義にお過ごしいただけます。
ダブルベッド2台の両方の2つの部屋に4泊しました。私と私の長男は1つの部屋に、私のMILと他の部屋には息子がいます。部屋は清潔で、スタッフはとても親切でフレンドリーで、場所はタイムズスクエアに非常に近いです。私たちはNYCに行ったことがなく、素晴らしい時間を過ごしました。私たちは間違いなく再びここに滞在します!他のレビュー担当者は、追加料金と返金の問題について不平を言います。これは、彼らが第三者サイト(このサイトのように)を介して予約し、細かい印刷物を読んでいなかったのです。すべてのNYCの宿泊施設には追加の税金と料金がたくさんあります。どのホテルに滞在しても、同じです。違いは、これらの料金の見積もりを含む毎日の料金を宣伝しているホテルと、一部のホテルが広告していないことです。また、契約は3rd party site(like this one) vs booking through the hotel’s website. また、it’s NYCall accommodations are small and compact. プラス、you’re there to see the city, not hang out in a hotel room all day.最後に、ホテルはコンチネンタルブレックファーストを宣伝していません。ドアを出るだけで、何十もの手頃な価格の場所が噛みつきます。
This is my third review of The Carlyle over the years (across probably 25 stays), and, sadly, the first one where I didn't feel I could give the hotel five stars. Although this is specifically about a stay in November 2022, it relates more generally to the renovated rooms at The Carlyle -- and here, the 11/22 stay was our third in a renovated room. Two were in Superior Suites, and one was in a Rosewood Suite. First, the good: The service continues to terrific, and greetings from the staff are genuine and caring. Across the board, when I raised an issue, someone tried to make things better. Housekeeping did not miss a beat. The bedding and linens are top notch. I found the beds in all three rooms terrific. And, the renovations fixed what had been a tendency for the HVAC to be spotty, depending on the room. The renovated systems worked flawlessly. And, the rooms are quiet -- no street noise or noise from adjoining rooms. In the Superior Suites, the bathrooms are small. In one of the two we stayed in, we had a half bath, which made things a bit better. But, if you want a big bathroom, then look elsewhere. I find the baths adequate, and the showers delightful (as they have been across 30 years). Now, the not so good: The lighting the renovated rooms is atrocious. In the living rooms of all three suites, there wasn't enough light to read in the evening, other than in the one chair that they equipped with a reading light. The desk lamp -- while stylish -- gives off about the equivalent of a 40 watt light bulb. Who does that? There are wall mounted sconces -- with the equivalent of 15 watt bulbs in them. One room had a ceiling unit that had 3 bulbs with the equivalent of 40 watt bulbs. Why? The traditional Carlyle had great lighting -- three way bulbs with up to 150 watts in total in each of 3 or 4 lamps in the room. In this version, I feel depressed in the rooms in the evening. And then there's the bedroom. While there are lamps on the end tables next to the bed, they are on one switch. Either both are on, or neither. Why? Why not have them separately switched? There's a spot-like reading light on each side of the bed -- but that's a poor substitute from the warmth of the bedside table light. Why would anyone design a hotel room this way? I suppose if all one does in a hotel room is look at one's phone or computer, or watch TV, the lighting will suffice. But if you want to read? Forget it. And then you get to storage. In each of the three suites there was no storage at all for your things (I've seen reviews that show some rooms having dressers). Each of the living room and bedroom had shelving, but the room designers filled the shelves with design stuff that serves no purpose, leaving those unavailable to the guest. Even the closets lack usable shelving, other than a high shelf above the hanging clothes. The old Carlyle rooms had vast amounts of storage space in large dressers. It's almost as if the room design