「Nice room. Big n classic. The location near shopping center and food market. So no need to worry about the food or what you gonna eat. The staff also nice. Either is Reception, waiters and cleaners all nice.」
「We booked the largest king room with sofa bed and kitchen. Unfortunately, its windows were to the street - not a highway, but pretty noisy 24/7.
In general, it was clean, but my grey socks and legs were black after about an hour of gathering and repacking luggage.
Breakfast - amazing. Eggs, sausages, bacon and hash browns. Hot oatmeal and waffles available (the latter with different flavors). Starbucks coffee with many options (I used only black Americano though). A lot of toppings , fresh fruits, etc. Overall - super.
Tee and coffee are available 24/7 near reception (breakfast area is on the 2nd floor).
Laundry - outdated and contains only one set of appliances, but pretty cheap (< $3 for the full cycle and quite fast (kind of 45+45 for gentle).」
「Torrance is a very nice neighbourhood. The hotel had everything nearby, good restaurants, mall, and supermarkets. The kitchen has pretty much everything. The coin laundry is handy.」
항상 LA 출장때마다 묵는 호텔입니다. LA 다운타운과는 좀 거리가 있지만, 그래서 조용하고 좀 더 안전합니다. 한국 사람들이 많은 지역이라 그런지 근처에 한식당들도 많습니다. 숙소는 깔끔했고, 메이드분들도 전문적이었습니다. 피트니스센터 시설과 청결도가 아주 좋았습니다. 다만 코인세탁실에 세탁기와 건조기가 1대씩밖에 없었고 필터 청소가 주기적으로 되지는 않는 것 같아 보였습니다. 그걸 제외하면 객실이나 전반적인 experience는 다 좋았습니다.
2025 6월 롱비치 출장으로 이용을 하였습니다.
* 침대(침구) : 깨끗하고 편안합니다.
* 주변소음 : 층간소음 및 옆방의 소음 없습니다.
다만 큰 길가에 았는 방은 야간에 과속하는 차량의 소음이
간헐적으로 있습니다. (크게 불편하진 않았음)
* 주방에 별도로 있어 콘도 같은 느낌이 있고 요리를 할 수
있도록 필요한 접시, 냄비 등이 구비 되어 있습니다.
* 조식 : 간단하지만 먹을만 합니다.
* 주변시설 : 도보 5~10분 거리에 마트 및 in&out버거 등이
있어서 편리합니다.
다시 방문할 의사 있습니다 ~!!
We extended our stay a few times, and each time we were required to make a $100 deposit for incidentals ( to be returned in up to 7 days if not used). Since we did not make any incidental or other charges, this repeated charge only drained our account and held the $100, making our hard-earned money unavailable to us. The property said it was company policy. The company says it's the policy of independent owners. Regardless, what is the purpose of repeatedly holding an extra $100 if guests want to extend the stay and there are no incidental charges for the current stay? If you must charge the $100 which we feel is necessary every time, how about a policy of one $100 charge for the first stay and replenishing or extending the $100 incidental charge (i.e., don't charge an extra $100 for an extension if the first $100 wasn't used or only partially used). Just let the original $100 roll over to the extended stay (if there were no incidental charges during the original stay) or only replenish the charge up to $100 if part of the original $100 was used (i.e., only charge enough to make $100). This way, your guests who are supposed to be your most valuable asset won't be made to feel they are being nickeled and dimed just for the convenience of an unfair or inequitable policy no one in authority appears to want to address. To address my concern would only take a small one-time programming change -- don't you agree